Photo of Evan Seeman

Evan J. Seeman is a lawyer in Robinson+Cole's Hartford office and focuses his practice on land use, real estate, environmental, and regulatory matters, representing local governments, developers and advocacy groups. He has spoken and written about RLUIPA, and was a lead author of an amicus curiae brief at the petition stage before the United States Supreme Court in a RLUIPA case entitled City of San Leandro v. International Church of the Foursquare Gospel.

Evan serves as the Secretary/Treasurer of the APA's Planning & Law Division. He also serves as the Chair of the Planning & Zoning Section of the Connecticut Bar Association's Young Lawyers Section, and is the former Co-Chair of its Municipal Law Section. He has been named to the Connecticut Super Lawyers® list as a Rising Star in the area of Land Use Law for 2013 and 2014. He received his B.A. in political science and Russian studies (with honors) from Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut, where he was selected as the President's Fellow in the Department of Modern Languages and Literature. Evan received his Juris Doctor at the University of Connecticut School of Law, where he served on the Connecticut Law Review. While in law school, he interned with the Connecticut Office of the Attorney General in the environmental department, and served as a judicial intern for the judges of the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Court. Following law school, Evan clerked for the Honorable F. Herbert Gruendel of the Connecticut Appellate Court.

On June 20, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington ruled that the City of Seattle violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act’s (RLUIPA) equal-terms provision by requiring a Catholic high school to apply for a variance to put up 70-foot high light poles for its athletic field in

On May 7, the City of Plano, Texas issued a cease and desist order to Agape Resource and Assistance Center, Inc., alleging that Agape was in violation of the City’s zoning ordinance (read the order here). A month later, the City revoked the order after Agape sent the City a demand letter threatening to

On June 16, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in Doe 3 v. Elmbrook School District (7th Cir. 2012), in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in a 7-3 en banc decision, found that two Wisconsin high schools had violated the Establishment Clause by holding their graduation ceremonies in a non-denominational

On May 27, we reported on the petition for a writ of certiorari (Docket No. 13-1214) filed by opponents of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro (“ICM”).  They sought review of a Tennessee Appellate Court decision that reversed the trial court’s ruling that the Rutherford County Regional Planning Commission violated notice requirements for the meeting at

A case to watch out of Oklahoma – American Atheists, Inc. v. Thompson, No. CIV-14-42-C (W.D. OK 2014) – involves a lawsuit brought by an atheist group challenging the placement of a 2,000 pound Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of the Oklahoma State Capitol.  American Atheists, Inc. contends that the placement of the

A dispute is heating up in Hilton Head, South Carolina between a church and a dog kennel that has been described as a “dog hotel.”  The Church of Christ of Hilton Head plans to appeal the Board of Zoning Appeals’ approval of a special exception to permit a dog kennel on property that abuts and

Opponents of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro’s (ICM) 52,000 square foot facility, consisting of a mosque and spaces for religious education, counseling, and other activities, on a 15-acre parcel in a residential district are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review the decision of the Tennessee Appellate Court upholding the Rutherford County Regional Planning Commission’s